CLINICAL
CONTRIBUTION TO
COMPLEX
REGIONAL PAIN SYNDROME (CRPS I)
Dr. H.A. Badala, Ex Prof. Adjunto of Medicine: Cardiology
University of Medicine
(Montevideo, R. O. Del Uruguay)
SUMMARY. The nature of this work is basically
clinical. Patient’s records with different forms and expressions of
complex regional pain syndrome I (CRPS I) are clinically analyzed. There
is an emphasis in the symptoms and signs that can be presented in each
patient allowing a correct diagnosis that is supported by the bone
scintigraphy (BS) with pyrophosphate of Tc 99 and radiological examination
of the effected area.
This analysis will allow the treating doctor a
correct and early diagnosis allowing an effective treatment that will lead
beneficially not only for the patient but also the health care system.
Key Words: complex regional pain syndrome,
CRPS I, alfa-1-adrenergic receptors, bone scintigraphy, BS, electrical
study, nitroglycerin.
INTRODUCTION
Synonyms: It has a wide range and it is known by the
English speaking countries as Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy Syndrome
(RSDS), and in Europe as Algodystrophy. The
actual name is Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS Type I and II). The
difference with CRPS II is that there is nerve injury.
We consider that it is incorporated within the
concept of the syndrome, due to a group of signs and symptoms that form
part of CRPS I.
Obeying the same physical pathology, the presence in
the affected area of the receptors
alpha-1-adrenergic in a larger number than normal, and a less sense if
sensibility for the circulating catecholamine that are at normal values.
This syndrome has been demonstrated as an illness of the alpha 1 –
adrenergic receptors (1-3).
Incidence: It is larger than presumed. In
Puteau-Colles’ fracture we can observe CRPS I, between 24 -28 %. In a
radius distal fracture we can find 26 %, and if we consider
all traumas it is 0.01% (4-7). In an operated carpal tunnel
syndrome we can observe between 0 – 5% (8).
We can observe our casuistic in a larger frequency in
middle age women and older, and leading causes to; secondary trauma,
carpal tunnel syndrome operated or not, or in tenosinovitis where we can
point out de Quervain’s (Figure 1).
A number of CRPS I cases are not diagnosis due to
the lack of knowledge of the syndrome or by unusual clinical forms.
|
 |
| Figure 1 |
|
Figure
1- Female 24 years old, CRPS I
RSD post surgery of de Quervain right
tenosinovitis. Form of heat initiation. |
FUNDAMENTALS OF THE STUDY:
(a)
To demonstrate that the basic element to diagnosis of CRPS I is
clinical.
(b)
To quote clinical forms of CRPS I were we can point out clinical
facts uncommon of this syndrome.
(c)
Value the complementarily examine in the diagnosis of CRPS I.
OBJECTIVES:
To refer to the treating doctor, my personal
experience lived through these clinical records that will allow a correct
diagnosis of CRPS I.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
CLINICAL FORM OF PAINLESS CRPS I?
A main symptom of this syndrome is the pain. How ever
we think that this syndrome can exist without pain. Example: A 60 year old
employed female patient, with post fracture of
the right olecranon, once the cast was removed she presented: in the upper
right extremity a level of distal signs of vegetation and swelling
of the hand and forearm, and cyanosis of the skin of the hand with
variations during the day.
That extremity was colder in reference to the
opposite extremity. Alterations of the
superficial sensibility (touch, thermal, pain). Loss of strength in the
hand- weakness in the apprehension, opposition of the thumb and at a
muscle inter-bone level, trophic alterations- diminution of muscle mass of
the tender and hipotender eminencies.
The Rx of the hand and forearm showed defuse carpal
osteoporosis and extremities of cubical and radius. BS was not carried
out. Treated as it were a CRPS I, the clinical situation mentioned
recovered after three months and as a consequence there is a discreet
alteration of the superficial sensibility.
CLINICAL FORM OF THE BEGINNING OF TREMOR.
This symptom can be seen in the course of this
syndrome but it is infrequent for it to begin as CRPS I with tremor.
Example: A young 22 year old female, that without an
initiating factor, she consults for
a fine tremor of her right hand without any
extrapiramidal signs: after months CRPS I settles in, its clinical form is
sharp inflammatory. She has an angiographic that shows a tremor in the
arteries: radius and cubical. In the arteriogram we can not observe
circulation in the hand. This shows us that not only in CRPS I the
microcirculation is affected but the macro circulation is also
compromised. She was treated for 12 months. At the present date she is
cured, living a normal life as a house wife and with her work; in the
following studies of more than 3 years, there have been no relapse (10)
(Figures 2,3,4,5).
 |
 |
| Figure 2 |
Figure 3 |
| |
 |
 |
| Figure 4 |
Figure 5 |
| |
|
Figures 2, 3, 4, 5
Female 23 years old, essential CRPS I RSD:
Incitation of treatment
Evolution
Angiography: cubic and radius arteries vasospasm
Angiography: there is no vascularization of the hand observed. |
CLINICAL FORM EN RELATIONSHIP TO THE OPERATED
CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME
A 42 year old female patient, technical in cardiology
after being operated she presented with carpal tunnel syndrome,
immediately post surgery she presented sharp inflammatory CRPS I.
Previous to the surgery when she was interrogated she expressed that she
had tumefactions of that hand, alteration of the sensibility that affected
the areas of the nerves, cubical and radius, she also had intermittences
changes in her skin coloration, shade of cyanosis.
(Figures 6, 7, 8)
The BS was (+) and the Rx showed diffused
osteoporosis in carpal cubical and radius distals. She was treated for
three months and the evolution of the treatment was a full recuperation of
all the clinical parameters of CRPS I.
 |
 |
| Figure 6 |
Figure 7 |
| |
 |
|
Figure 8 |
|
Figures 6,7,8
Female 45 years
old, CRPS I MSI secondary to an operated carpal canal.
Incitation of
treatment
Bone Scintigraphy
(+)
Evolution |
CLINICAL FORM OF A COLD BEGINNING
Example:
A 26 year old female operated of a de Quervain tenosinovitis, she began
immediately post operation a form of a cold initiation of CRPS I. The
hand Rx showed a diffused osteoporosis and a bone BS (-); her treatment
evolved very well until almost all symptoms and signs disappeared.
(Figures 9, 10, 11).
 |
 |
| Figure 9 |
Figure 10 |
| |
 |
|
Figure 11 |
|
Figures 9,10,11
Female 26 years
old, CRPS I secondary to an operated de Quervain tenosinovitis.
Initiation (cold
form)
Bone Scintigraphy
(-)
Evolution |
CLINICAL FORM POST HIP SURGERY
At present day hip surgery is used with more
frequency, especially the prosthesis for traumatic complex fractures or
secondary arthritis to dysplasia. The CRPS I observed from the post
operation has deferential diagnosis and especially with the feared
articular infection.
A male patient 52 years old, in apparent good health
suffers a traffic accident and fractures his hip. After his surgery, post
operation immediately he complains of pain in the area of the operated hip
expanding through out his inferior homolateral. An articular punction was
practice, to which he was aseptic. After months of bearing permanent and
intense pain, there is a functional impotence of the extremity associated.
He arrives with two crutches, not being able to lean against the foot of
the operated hip. Once he was examined, being in apparent good health, not
presenting a fever, with an operational injury which appears to be
tumeficated recent and with a red-cyanotic color. In the distal level of
the extremity especially the foot there are clinical characteristic of
CRPS I (Figures 12, 13, 14, 15).
The diagnoses was a secondary CRPS I due to the
operation of the hip. He was treated for 6 months. He is currently cured
and works in USA.
 |
 |
| Figure 12 |
Figure 13 |
| |
 |
 |
| Figure 14 |
Figure 15 |
| |
|
Figures 12,13,14,15
Male 45 years old,
CRPS I secondary to a right hip osteosintesis.
Initiation operated
scar
Initiation of foot
and leg
Evolution of
operated scar
Evolution of foot and leg |
CLINICAL FORM OF MIRROR
It is that CRPS I that affects an extremity – post
lesion or in an essential way- and at the same time or subsequently after
the syndrome manifests itself in the contra lateral extremity with the
same or less intensity in consequence of the symptoms and signs. Example:
An 81 year old retired female, with a left radius fractured forearm. Once
the cast was taken off she presented CRPS I in that extremity and almost
subsequently presented itself in her upper contra lateral extremity. She
was treated for 5 months in which she had a very good evolution and was
discharged (Figures 16, 17, 18, 19).
 |
 |
| Figure 16 |
Figure 17 |
| |
 |
 |
| Figure 18 |
Figure 19 |
| |
|
Figures 16, 17, 18,
19
Female 82 years old
CRPS I secondary to a right radius fracture.
Initiation clinical
mirror form
Initiation palmary
face
Evolution dorsal
face
Evolution palmary
face |
CLINICAL FORM SECONDARY TO A POUTEAU-COLLES
Its importance is given due to the high incidence of
CRPS I observed as a complication to this fracture. Patient, SP, a 62 year
old female that with a post right fracture of Pouteau- Colles after two
months, CRPS I is acquired in her upper right extremity. She is
administrated nasal calcitonin without receiving any therapeutic result.
Scintigraphy with Tc 99 (+). She was treated with transdermic patches of
nitroglycerin with a 0mg2hr 12 hr.
Liberation obtaining good results after 2 months of
treatment and without any adverse secondary
effects (Figures 20, 21, 22, 23).
 |
 |
| Figure 20 |
Figure 21 |
| |
 |
 |
| Figure 22 |
Figure 23 |
| |
|
Figures 20,21,22,23
Female 62 years old CRPS I secondary to a left
Pouteau-Colles fracture.
Initiation dorsal face
Initiation palmary face
Bone Scintigraphy (+)
Evolution of dorsal face |
A 62 year old female patient presented with CRPS I as
a complication of a Pouteau-Colles fracture to the left once the external
adjustments were removed. We would like to point out that she presented a
“slight touch”. The BS was (+), she was treated with nitroglycerin in the
usual way and by the end of three and a half months, she had a good
outcome with a slight diminution of her superficial sensitivity and of the
articulation of her fist. She later presented a slight adverse secondary
effect that stopped the treatment from continuing (Figures 24, 25, 26,
27).
 |
 |
| Figure 24 |
Figure 25 |
| |
 |
 |
| Figure 26 |
Figure 27 |
| |
|
Figures 24,25,26,27
Female CRPS I secondary to a right
Pouteau-Colles fracture.
Initiation dorsal face
Initiation palmary face
Bone Scintigraphy (+)
Evolution of
dorsal face |
METHODS
The methodology employed for the patients with CRPS
I, is supported by diagnostic which are clinical (11). The simple Rx of
the affected area is a late expression that can show a muted or diffused
osteoporosis, which in this syndrome is more intense, from that which is
observed in women climacteric, as if it had coursed in a period of ten
years.
Nuclear medicine used the technetium-labeled
diphosphomate bone scans, it has a high specificity and sensitivity and
precocidad in the diagnosis of CRPS I, showing areas of increased bone
intake of the 99 technetium – labeled diphosphomate bone scan especially
in the phase two and three of the study in the affected areas (12), it
describes forms of CRPS I with BS (-) (13). It sustained that this form of
BS (-) is not CRPS I (14).
We do not recommend electric studies in the affected
extremity.
DISCUSSION
In relation to the incidence we have a proportion of
3 to1 women in relation to men.
Doury talked about the high incidences of the
essential forms. We have in our study a low frequency of essential forms
(13).
Does painless CRPS I exist? We do not have any
more experience than the case presented. But we lay down this possibility
due to all the symptoms and signs that follow-up to the syndrome and the
response to the nitroglycerin. Regretfully the BS could not be done.
Micro and macro circulation, their has been a
emphasis in this syndrome to the affection of the microcirculation, but we
can see through an angiography how it compromises the macro circulation as
we could see in the patient with the clinical form that initiates with
tremor.
In reference to the bone scintigraphy we have
to consider that if it is negative (-) it does not mean it is CRPS I. For
us there are forms of CRPS I (-) as, described when we talked about the
clinical form that has a cold initiation.
Electrical study in a member affected by CRPS I,
we consider that it is aggressive and therefore increases the pain and
shows incorrect results.
1. A working female patient
27 years old consulted for CRPS I after a evolution of 8 years in her
upper right extremity post concussion. In this patient her pain increased
post study and the results were informed as “normal”. The simple Rx showed
osteoporosis and the BS was (+). The present treatment, she has had real
improvement at the end of three months.
2. A working male 45 year
old, post fracture of the right radial. Once the cast was taken off the
evolution was not normal and there was intense pain, he had an electrical
study preformed. The results were: “syndrome of the trapped cubical nerve
of the elbow”. He is operated and the nerve was normal. We diagnosed him
with CRPS I, he was treated for 4 months, he is cured and without any side
effects.
3. A male country laborer
63 years old. Due to a sprain wrist he presents clinical manifestations
and is diagnostic “paretico amiotrodico syndrome” the electrical study
informs “neuropatia of the middle nerves and cubical as observed in the
trapped nerve syndromes” seen by us by the time his 4 month being of his
clinical case he was diagnosed with CRPS I. With 3 months of treatment,
his evolution was very good, persisting a slight superficial sensibility.
He regains his choirs in the country and his evolution was monitored for
10 months, there were no recidivas of CRPS I.
In relation of CRPS I and carpal tunnel
syndrome (CTS), three facts can be considered. The first, without
being operated CRPS I can be determined. The second, after being operated
the syndrome appears. The third, as exposed, being operated while the CRPS
I is in course. From there CRPS I must be discarded faced with CTS before
being operated on.
In regards to the clinical form of CRPS I post
surgery of the hip we must consider, if the patient presents
infectious syndrome, analyze the surgery scare and if at a distal level
changes of the color of the skin and alterations to heat or sweat, in more
or less in regards to the counter lateral extremity. If the strength is
disable in the foot or toes if the protopatic superficial sensibility is
altered. If there are any trophic alterations and verify the state of the
nail and fuzz.
The physical exam is complemented; in our work, we
did not find any modifications with the profound sensibility study,
osteotendinosos reflex, and arterial pulse.
Institutional Treatment (9)
In all the patient mentioned as a basic element of
the treatment the use of the Nitroglycerin transdermic patches, in general
with liberation of 0mg2 hour 12 hour and for a period no less than 3
months.
CONCLUSION
This work is clinically based, on how CRPS I
is diagnosed. It incidence are more frequent than as is normally supposed.
We can generally observe it in the members and
secondary trauma which its seriousness does not coincide with the
seriousness of the syndrome, and as a complication of surgery, in carpal
tunnel syndrome, ruptures of aquilles heel, and in tenosinovitis as served
in an example in de Quervain’s tendinits.
The results of the complementary exams were valued
for diagnose, pointing out the high specification, sensibility and early
results of the BS. It was explicit not to proceed in the electrical study
in the member or members affected by the CRPS I.
Different forms of manifestation of this syndrome
were clinically discovered. The importance of conducting a correct
interrogation and physical exam was pointed out to allow a correct
diagnoses and precocious treatment.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1.
Blomery PA. A review of reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Australian
Family Physician. 1995; 24: 1651-1655.
2.
Drummond PD, Shipworth S; and Finch PM. Alpha – 1- adrenoceptors in
normal and hyperalgesic human skin. Clinical Science. 1996;
91:73-77.
3.
Arnold J, Teasell RW, MacLeod AP, et al. Increased venous alpha -1-
adrenoceptors responsiveness in patients with reflex sympathetic
dystrophy. Ann Internal Med. 1993; 118: 619-621.
4.
Field J and Atkins RM. Algodystrophy is an early complication of
Colles fracture, J Hand Surg (British and European Volume) 1997;
22b: 178-182.
5. Laulan J, Bismuth
JP, Sicre G, Garaud P. The different types of algodystrophy after fracture
of the distal radius: Predictive criteria
of outcome after 1 year. J Hand Surg (British and
European Volume) 1997; 22: 441-447.
6.
Borg AA. Reflex
sympathetic dystrophy syndrome. Disability and Rehabilitation.
1996; 18: 174-180.
7.
Kozin F. Reflex
sympathetic dystrophy syndrome. Current Opinion in Rheumatology.
1994; 6: 210-216.
8.
Blombery P. A; A
review of reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Australian Family Physician.
1995; 24: 1651-1655.
9.
Badala H, Toledo S. Tratamiento de la Distrofia Simpatico Refleja (DSR).
Con nitroglicerina transdermica. Archivos de Medicina Interna
Volumen XXIV; 1-01 52 Marzo 2002 pages 23-27.
10.
Badala H. VI Simposio Internacional de Osteoporosis y III Simposio de
Enfermedades del Metabolismo Oseo y Mineral del MERCOSUR 5-7 de Setiembre
1003.
11.
Badala H, Toledo S. Distrofia Simpatico Refleja Archivos de Medicina
Interna Volumen XXII: 3: 95-146 Setiembre 2000.
12.
Schiepers C. Clinical value of dynamic bone and vascular
scintigraphy in diagnosis reflex sympathetic dystrophy of the upper
extremity. Hand Clinics 1997 13: 423-429.
13.
Doury P. Algodystrophy. A spectrum of disease, historical
perspectives criteria of diagnosis and principles of treatment. Hand
Clinics August 1997 13 (3).
14.
Driessens M, Infrequent presentations of reflex sympathetic
dystrophy and pseudo dystrophy. Hand Clin. 1997; 13: 413-422.

I would like to thank Dr. Badala
for allowing me to post this article on our website.
Also, I would like to thank Ms.
Gabriela Gonzalez for all her hard work
translating this article from Spanish to English.
Thank you both so very much!
Eric M. Phillips